home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0736>
- <title>
- Jun. 06, 1994: Rwanda:Sorry, Wrong Country
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Jun. 06, 1994 The Man Who Beat Hitler
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- RWANDA, Page 34
- Sorry, Wrong Country
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> Despite its outrage, the international community has neither
- the will nor the way to stop the slaughter
- </p>
- <p>By Marguerite Michaels--Reported by Bonnie Angelo/New York and Andrew Purvis/Kasensero
- </p>
- <p> Some of the bodies lie motionless on the Ugandan shore. Others
- float in the breaking waves or bob against tangled beds of water
- hyacinth. Most are mutilated: limbs slashed, heads missing,
- a scattering of pale forms indistinguishable from one another
- except the ways in which they died. The corpses, swept as many
- as 60 miles by the rain-swollen Kagera River in Rwanda to the
- edges of Lake Victoria, are the latest evidence of a savage
- war.
- </p>
- <p> Seven weeks of such and estimates of a death toll anywhere from
- 200,000 to half a million have moved the world to tears--but
- not much else. Why is it that the international community has
- proved unwilling or unable to stop the slaughter?
- </p>
- <p> Calling it "a genocide" last week, U.N. Secretary-General Boutros
- Boutros-Ghali angrily lashed out at the hand wringing. For weeks,
- he has pleaded with more than 30 heads of state but has managed
- to get firm pledges of men for a Rwandan peacekeeping force
- from only four African countries. "It is a scandal," Boutros-Ghali
- said at a New York City press conference. "All of us are responsible
- for this failure."
- </p>
- <p> On the same day, President Clinton told the graduating class
- of the U.S. Naval Academy that "we cannot solve every such outburst
- of civil strife or militant nationalism simply by sending in
- our forces." Europe feels the same way. Belgium, Rwanda's former
- colonial ruler, lost 10 of its U.N. peacekeepers when the fighting
- broke out in early April. Said a government spokesman last week:
- "At the moment, we have no willingness to have contact with
- the so-called government in Kigali, which consists of a gang
- of murderers." Neither French troops nor French-equipped African
- troops are acceptable to the mainly Tutsi Rwanda Patriotic Front:
- France helped arm and train their opponents, the Hutu forces
- of the late President Juvenal Habyarimana.
- </p>
- <p> Few Western governments are willing to risk their own soldiers
- to help Rwanda. Public outrage in Britain may be growing, but
- Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd answered an opposition member's
- challenge to act in Rwanda with the lament that there was no
- clear mission for British troops. Memories of the 18 soldiers
- lost in Somalia make the U.S. especially reluctant to intervene
- in a largely ethnic bloodbath in a strategically insignificant
- nation. Although both the U.S. and Britain voted two weeks ago
- in the Security Council to send a 5,500-strong U.N. force to
- Rwanda, Italy is the only non-African country that has said
- it is willing to participate.
- </p>
- <p> The former colonial powers that used to intervene regularly
- have devolved responsibility to the U.N. European leaders agree
- with the U.S. that African nations should take the lead in policing
- Rwanda, even though they lack the money and equipment to carry
- out such a perilous mission successfully. Ghana, Ethiopia, Senegal
- and Zimbabwe have promised troops, and the U.N. hopes Egypt
- and Nigeria will also contribute. That only intensifies suspicion
- that the white West's refusal to come to the aid of black Africa
- is racist. Wrote columnist Simon Hoggart in the British daily
- Guardian: "Nobody you know has ever been on holiday to Rwanda.
- And Rwandans don't look like us. They have even less clout than
- Bosnian Muslims."
- </p>
- <p> Long before Rwanda's descent into chaos, Western donors had
- grown exhausted by the problems that beset sub-Saharan Africa:
- the ceaseless wars, ethnic violence, political turmoil, massive
- poverty and persistent famine. The region leads the world in
- the number of refugees and people displaced within their own
- country's borders, surpassing South Asia, North Africa and the
- Middle East combined.
- </p>
- <p> Even if the West were willing to help, no one is sure what should
- be done. "Boutrous-Ghali's outburst was not helpful," says a
- former U.N. peacekeeping official. "The members have got to
- get together and figure out what might work." Since the U.N.
- force was authorized, arguments have continued about what it
- should do, where the troops should be stationed, what their
- exact mission would be and how they would exit. U.S. officials
- question what any peacekeeping force can do unless both of the
- warring sides in Rwanda agree to a cease-fire.
- </p>
- <p> That is not likely any time soon. The rebels control nearly
- 60% of the country and are advancing into the capital of Kigali.
- Government soldiers reportedly are abandoning the city. Although
- another round of cease-fire talks is scheduled this week, a
- rebel statement issued in Washington said any attempts to stop
- them now "would be like intervening in Berlin in April 1945
- to prevent the Allies from defeating Hitler."
- </p>
- <p> A Patriotic Front victory without reprisal killings might bring
- the only kind of contribution the international community is
- willing to make: a massive influx of humanitarian aid. Already
- the U.S. and many other countries have donated tens of millions
- of dollars in food, blankets and medicines to the handful of
- international-aid organizations still in Rwanda. But the fighting
- makes delivery of most relief supplies nearly impossible. "Money
- is not enough," says Ibrahim Osman of the International Federation
- of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. "Without serious military
- intervention, Rwanda cannot be saved."
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-